THE CONCEPT OF WORLD
HERITAGE SITE AND CHENNAI’S BEST BET TOWARDS ACHIEVING ONE OF ITS OWN
Chennai
our city, with its rich history (a minimum of 350 yrs), lacks in one aspect
other Indian metropolitan cities like New Delhi and Mumbai don’t. What is it?
Any guesses? It is a World Heritage Site (WHS). New Delhi can boast of a
handful of WHS’s like the Qutb complex, Humayuns tomb etc. Mumbai to its credit
has the Chatthrapathi Sivaji Terminus (Victoria Terminus). Is this because
(a) We don’t have anything of that sort to be given
the World heritage status
or
(b) We don’t
appreciate the heritage we have and take steps to achieve the World Heritage
Status to a site within our city.
Going
by the history of Chennai, it cannot be option (a), it’s always option (b). To
prove my point lets understand certain things.
What
is heritage? - “Heritage is our
legacy from the past, what we live with today, and what we pass on to future
generations. Our cultural and natural heritage are both irreplaceable sources
of life and inspiration”[1]
What is a
World heritage Site (WHS)? - To begin with, it would be better if we understand
the term World Heritage Site clearly. The UNESCO (United Nations
Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation) under its specialized sector
culture formed the world heritage committee, comprising a group of 21
representatives from countries who agreed to abide by the world heritage
convention of 1972. The main reason behind this was to safeguard the rich and
varied, Natural and Cultural heritage of the world and pass it on to the future
generations. One of the exceptional concepts of World heritage site is that of
its universal application as they are the property of the people of the World,
irrespective of the territory on which they are located. In all, there are 981
world heritage sites inscribed from 160 countries. Out of this 30 inscriptions
are from our country.[2] The
latest to the list from India is a group of six hill forts of Rajasthan. To be
inscribed to this list the site has to be justified with at least one of the 10
selection criteria’s, six for Cultural heritage (the ones listed below) and
four for Natural heritage.
Selection criteria
(Cultural)[3]
i.
to represent a masterpiece of human
creative genius;
- to
exhibit an important interchange of human values, over a span of time or
within a cultural area of the world, on developments in architecture or
technology, monumental arts, town-planning or landscape design;
- to
bear a unique or at least exceptional testimony to a cultural tradition or
to a civilization which is living or which has disappeared;
- to
be an outstanding example of a type of building, architectural or
technological ensemble or landscape which illustrates (a) significant
stage(s) in human history;
- to
be an outstanding example of a traditional human settlement, land-use, or
sea-use which is representative of a culture (or cultures), or human
interaction with the environment especially when it has become vulnerable
under the impact of irreversible change;
- to
be directly or tangibly associated with events or living traditions, with
ideas, or with beliefs, with artistic and literary works of outstanding universal
significance. (The Committee considers that this criterion should
preferably be used in conjunction with other criteria);
In addition to the above list the
protection, management, authenticity and integrity of properties are also
important considerations[4].
With this introduction to the concept
of World Heritage Site (WHS), let us move on to our case that is Chennai city.
When we think of Chennai as a heritage rich city, many buildings pop up in our
minds. The city of Chennai is dotted with a number of religious buildings
including temples, churches and mosques. Also found in Chennai are the best
examples of Indo-Sarasenic architecture like the Ripon building, Head post
office, State Bank of India building to name a few. All these buildings form
and showcase the rich heritage of Chennai, but there is one site which stands
apart from all these and has been the fulcrum of the city of Chennai that we
see today. That is the Fort St. George of Chennai.
It was in 1600’s that the English East
India Company started its trade in India, from Surat on the Western Coast. To
have a good hold on the spice trade, which they were very much interested in, they
needed to settle down with a port close to the Malaccan strait. In the process
they selected a piece of land in the coromandel coast and stuck a deal with the
local Vijayanagara Chieftain for that land. The construction of the Fort was
initiated and it was completed in 23rd April 1644AD and was named
Fort St. George after the patron Saint of England, whose birthday fell on the
same day. This day is usually referred to as the birth of Chennai city that we
see today. With this very short history of the Fort St. George (though does not
justify the 3.5 centuries of existence) as background we shall now see if it is
a potential World Heritage Site, by seeing if it matches with any of the selection criteria listed above.
Criteria (ii) – Fort St. George
established as a small factory, developed into a fort, which became the node of
British Empire in India and other South East Asian countries. The 350 years of
its existence has seen interactions between different cultural and ethnic backgrounds.
The fort has been the mainstay of British Empire, also it has been a place
where Armenians, Portuguese, Dutch along with the English resided, it was also
captured by the French in the mid of 18th century. There existed a settlement
of the natives called the Black town which was later resettled further north of
the city. Throughout its existence, Fort St. George has been a site which has
witnessed the interactions between different ethnic groups.
Criteria (iii) – Fort St. George is the
place which gave the British the impetus to develop their stronghold on the
South East Asian regions of the world. The fact that the English colonised a
number of countries in the region after establishing themselves in Madras (Fort
St. George) bears testimony to the importance of this fort in establishing
their dominance and colonising, which has been a major event in the history of
the world.
Criteria (iv) – The medieval military
architecture of Europe saw the development of Star fort category of fort
building. The Fort St. George is one of the best examples of this Star fort category
and was one of the first of its kinds in these parts of the globe. (In addition
to the above criteria’s there are certain individual buildings within the fort
complex which may individually be inscribed as WHS based on its importance in
history and construction technology.
Example for this type of building is St. Marys Church.)
Google earth image showing triangular
bastions composing a star fort
|
The political will is required here to tackle a major problem of stake
holder and ownership, without which the site cannot be inscribed a WHS. Fort
St. George comprises of a number of individual structures within its walls. These
buildings are in the possession of either Archaeological Survey of India (ASI)
or The Army or The State Government of Tamil Nadu. Some are owned by ASI, where
as some are not owned but are maintained by ASI. My personal experience says
that there is some sort of confusion among themselves. To be inscribed
this has to be sorted out. Same kind of problem was seen in Red fort Delhi
before it was inscribed a WHS, Only after it was properly dealt with, was it
possible to get the status. So, it’s high time we heritage enthusiast and
citizens of the city try to take away all the differences and make sure we get
one site World Heritage Site for our city to start with !! HOPE . . .
Muzakkir G. M. Bijli
This is a reprint of the article which came in the magazine of MEASI Academy of Architecture in 2014... Putting it here on the forts 375th birth day....
This article though does not do justice to the importance of the fort, but i hope this gives a gist of its importance....
Comments